Finally!

A nice bio piece on Michelle by the New York Times, no less. Annoys me that the Obama Campaign believes she needs a "slight" makeover, but I understand why. For the article, click here.

But here is another reason why I heart her:

“I hate diversity workshops,” she says. “Real change comes from having enough comfort to be really honest and say something very uncomfortable.”

White Shadow needs to work for her when she is First Lady.

Subway thoughts, Part I

Here is what I hate: a barely crowded subway train and I am the whitest girl on it. Why do I hate that? Because everyone's un/conscious racism kicks in, and then they all have to sit next to me, when there are PERFECTLY other fine people to sit next to.

Sold at the Texas Republican Convention last week....

White people kill me.

And another one...

Article on the GOP Smear campaign against Michelle in today's Politico. Read it here. The only real flaw with the article is that the author doesn't take on the race dimension, though she does recall the smear tactic used earlier this month about a supposed interview Michelle gave when she said she didn't like "Whitey." (But really, who does?) And now we all know that not only did she not give said interview, but the story comes from a fiction novel, The Power Broker. Read about that here.

Speeches

Senator Obama's speech on race in February was heartfelt, intelligent, and necessary (for both his campaign and the country). He knew he had to make that speech, and he rose to the occasion.

Hillary Clinton did not make a speech regarding her historical campaign or the sexism frenzy that occurred due to her campaign. I don't know if a speech was necessary, as there were (and are) many supporters willing to raise the issue of sexism and of her being the first serious female Presidential contender. (Side note: Obama had to make his speech, because it is a trickier when airing the racism of the country and media - he couldn't really rely on supporters, both prominent and on the ground, to make the racism case for him. It would have hurt his campaign.)

Some now want a speech on women/sexism/misogyny and politics and the shaping of the nation. And they want Senator Obama to make it. As reported in today's NY Times,

"Some are calling for boycotts against MSNBC and CNN, and many are urging Mr. Obama, who addressed racism in a major speech, to address sexism, too."

First off, does anyone not see the irony in asking a man to do this?

Second, why is it that one always expects non-white men to speak for other non-white men? Because Senator Obama spoke on racism, he then can speak on sexism? It reminds me of all those times when "well-meaning" white people ask me, what do Black people think? Or when some "well-meaning" black friends ask me, what are white people thinking? It is also akin to when people ask me, what do women think? Or asking Roc, what do Black people think?

How about we ask Clinton to do this speech? Or another prominent woman - like Speaker Pelosi? Or former Secretary of State Albright? (you know we can't ask Secretary Rice)

Or, how about MICHELLE OBAMA?!?!?!? Okay, we can't ask her because many white women would feel uncomfortable having a black women speak the truth - and it would make many HRC supporters recognize the confluence of race and gender, and we can't be having that, now can we?

Michelle Smear Watch - Day 3

Fox News outdid themselves! While discussing the Michelle Smear Campaign (they of course disavow knowledge or participation), the following headline appeared:

OUTRAGED LIBERALS: STOP PICKING ON OBAMA'S BABY MAMA!

Seriously? Did I read that correctly? The man's wife of untold years, is being called his baby mama? See how they are enforcing the stereotype of single-mother households within the Black community? What's next - Michelle driving in her Cadallic that she bought with her welfare check? (Thank You President Reagan!)

Head Exploding....while fists are bumping......

Can't even deal with this situation. Jim Rutenberg of the New York Times sums it up and critiques it perfectly. Read the whole Fox News declaring Obama a terrorist because of a fist bump here.

And yes, Michelle is caught up in the mix. The smear campaign continues...........

It's Alive!

The campaign against Michelle Obama has begun. For more on these evil antics, read today's New York Times - Maureen Dowd has the skinny. Click here.

Or you can read this piece in the Los Angeles Times. Click here.

What Would Jesus Do?

Even today when I do something nice for someone (like giving up a seat on the subway, or holding the door), there is a good chance that I will be told "That was mighty Christian of you." Ooooh, so close to being mighty white! Anyhoo, for today's post, we are going to have switch it around a bit, and say to Senator Joe Lieberman, "That was mighty Jewish of you." (I couldn't in good faith use Christian, as that would really make me mighty Christian!)

Its bad enough that Lieberman continues to insinuate that Obama is a secret Muslim (not that there would be anything wrong with that - mighty Mulism indeed), but that he behind much of the agita in the Jewish community on how Obama is perceived.

Now Lieberman is calling Obama "sleazy." Not very Jewish or Christian, if you ask me.

When is Harry Reid going to take Lieberman down for the good of the party? I know the Dems have a one person majority, but this is just embarassing. I look forward to the day that Reid ousts Lieberman and then I can say, "Harry, that was downright Mormon of you."

Its not one or the other....

I am officially tired of people thinking the campaign, the voters, the media, the spokespeople are either sexist OR racist. Howard Dean recently said:

"Major networks have featured outrageous comments that… if the words were reversed, and they were about race, people would have been fired."

Its not like the media has not been racist simply because they are sexist. Racist language has become coded, so its harder to see, hear, deconstruct, protest. It is also unfortunately true that women's "place" in society is such that sexist and misogynistic comments are the norm and don't need to be as coded. But by focusing solely on sexism, and ignoring the racist implications in commentary and candidate support, we miss a larger opportunity to really examine the race and gender power structure in the United States.

Its not a either/or situation. I am going to tell you something shocking, so brace yourself:

PEOPLE CAN BE SEXIST AND RACIST AT THE SAME TIME!

We all should be fighting BOTH racism and sexism at the same time. Let's not make it an either/or situation. Demand respect for both HRC and Obama, because to hurt one is to hurt the other.